{"id":1222,"date":"2021-05-11T07:23:09","date_gmt":"2021-05-11T15:23:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/readingthechurchfathers.wordpress.com\/?p=1222"},"modified":"2023-01-09T01:23:03","modified_gmt":"2023-01-09T09:23:03","slug":"julius-africanus-on-the-genealogy-of-jesus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nemoslibrary.com\/patristics\/julius-africanus-on-the-genealogy-of-jesus\/","title":{"rendered":"Julius Africanus on the Genealogy of Jesus"},"content":{"rendered":"

For the priestly tribe of Levi, too, was allied with the kingly tribe of Juda, through the circumstance that Aaron married Elizabeth the sister of Nahshon, and that Eleazar again married the daughter of Phatiel, and begat children. … And for this reason the one traced the pedigree of Jacob the father of Joseph from David through Solomon; the other traced that of Heli also, though in a different way, the father of Joseph, from Nathan the son of David. And they ought not indeed to have been ignorant that both orders of the ancestors enumerated are the generation of David, the royal tribe of Juda.<\/p>\n

For whereas in Israel the names of their generations were enumerated either according to nature or according to law,\u2014according to nature, indeed, by the succession of legitimate offspring, and according to law whenever another raised up children to the name of a brother dying childless; for because no clear hope of resurrection was yet given them, they had a representation of the future promise in a kind of mortal resurrection, with the view of perpetuating the name of one deceased;\u2014whereas, then, of those entered in this genealogy, some succeeded by legitimate descent as son to father, while others begotten in one family were introduced to another in name, mention is therefore made of both\u2014of those who were progenitors in fact, and of those who were so only in name. Thus neither of the evangelists is in error, as the one reckons by nature and the other by law. For the several generations, viz., those descending from Solomon and those from Nathan, were so intermingled by the raising up of children to the childless, and by second marriages, and the raising up of seed, that the same persons are quite justly reckoned to belong at one time to the one, and at another to the other, i.e., to their reputed or to their actual fathers. And hence it is that both these accounts are true, and come down to Joseph, with considerable intricacy indeed, but yet quite accurately.<\/p>\n

If we reckon the generations from David through Solomon, Matthan is found to be the third from the end, who begat Jacob the father of Joseph. But if, with Luke, we reckon them from Nathan the son of David, in like manner the third from the end is Melchi, whose son was Heli the father of Joseph. For Joseph was the son of Heli, the son of Melchi. … Matthan and Melchi, having taken the same woman to wife in succession, begat children who were uterine brothers, as the law did not prevent a widow, whether such by divorce or by the death of her husband, from marrying another. By Estha, then\u2014for such is her name according to tradition\u2014Matthan first, the descendant of Solomon, begets Jacob; and on Matthan\u2019s death, Melchi, who traces his descent back to Nathan, being of the same tribe but of another family, having married her, as has been already said, had a son Heli. Thus, then, we shall find Jacob and Heli uterine brothers, though of different families. And of these, the one Jacob having taken the wife of his brother Heli, who died childless, begat by her the third, Joseph\u2014his son by nature and by account.<\/p>\n

References<\/h4>\n